🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Momentum

Across Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our kids' childhood". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media users. Officials have stated that an similar ban is "a potential measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these services, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on strong data".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who died after encountering disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Approach

Stateside, action is primarily happening at the local government level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from some figures to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, other nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies take a more cautious tone. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this international conversation continues, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to make changes on their own.